??? 11/17/07 11:58 Read: times |
#147116 - Linux attacks Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Russell Bull said:
Far for me to say that Windows is secure - we know its not. Given the same level of attack, would Linux fare any better? Whilst the response would most likely be faster, would the damage be any less? Especially considering if the same quality of Windows users were running Linux? Many (most ?) of the biggest websites in world run Apache on Linux hardware - these systems are effectively open to attack all the time, yet I don't see them being compromised ? Steve |
Topic | Author | Date |
Says it better than I can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re 'evangelism' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So limited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I believe it's obvious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If YOU would read what I posted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wine and VirtualBox | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and you suggest that for DEVELOPMENT??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Don't know about Linux but love your D52.EXE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What makes Linux less vunerable? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that's great, but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, it is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linux vs Windows | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What sort of Linux do you have, Craig? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh yea ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Looks like... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Security | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AMEN! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Everybody should use linux! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linux attacks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not Targets | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Caveat Emptor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
email vulnerability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Kleinstein | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linux is the "solution" ... for now ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Concur | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Layers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Perhaps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Separation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If Linux was an airline | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keep reading | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bad logic | 01/01/70 00:00 |