??? 05/22/07 14:22 Read: times |
#139627 - in other words, Responding to: ???'s previous message |
they cheat.
It's not unusual to claim "1GHz bandwidth", even if the input attenuation is such that almost nothing except noise gets through at that frequency, and of course it is for "repeated signals", as Richard stated above - and it's only some 100Msamples/s (or even not that - some cheap USB "oscilloscopes" simply have no sample memory, just bulk dump what they acquire through a high speed USB channel - and if it chokes...) JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
[OT] DSO- How it's made ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
look at ADC spec's. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
in other words, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tricks & tricks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Analog memories... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that's what the analog 'scope does! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some interesting reading from Maxim | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have no doubt you can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use for what | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Expansion slot test equipment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there is now a plethora of such with USB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
crappy GUI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I prefer the "feel" of manually controlled gear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Can't be done, or just hasn't been done? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there's no reason it couldn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The PeeCee would get in the way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not only... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a few buttons, dials, and knobs, but not enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Critics and suggestions invited - 1GHz sampler | 01/01/70 00:00 |