??? 05/01/07 04:14 Read: times |
#138358 - A few corrections ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Rob Vassar said:
Richard Erlacher said:
So what has that to do with the question asked? If you wasted the entire generating output of the US, 100% loss of every man made watt, you now know how many watts per square meter it would add to the global energy budget. Basically nothing. Cloud cover has a bigger impact than this. You seemed to be implying that the actual heat generated by man is a factor. The numbers clearly show it isn't. Richard Erlacher said:
I dont know what your point was in citing the energy per square millimeter, or whatever. Perhaps it's to show how small a percentage of the total energy on the land mass that is, but I'm here to tell you that even though a small amount of lead is not a terrible thing, if a 158 grains (a grain = 1/7000 of a pound) of it ends up in your head, particularly if it gets there at 1200 fps, it will work out badly for you. It's not just the quantity. RE It is exceedingly rare case when an analogy such as this serves any useful purpose is a discussion. FWIW - 1200 fps is approaching (and in several cases exceeds) the pressure limit for most of the cartridges where a 158 grain projectile is indicated. A couple notable wildcats excepted, but they suffer from top strap erosion. (Hey... I do live in Texas...) First of all, 1200 fps is the typical muzzle velocity of a load from a shotgun, but also of a pretty typical 158 grain hollow-base wad cutter (practice target bullet) from my '357. I load 'em backward in my home-defense ammo, and, at close range, they'll tear the arm off an intruder, yet they won't shoot through a wall. I don't know what the relevance of the planetary energy budget is, but I know that the designer, God or nature, provided that it be sufficiently capable of coping with non-industrial CO2 and heating. Nature provided sufficient resources to sequester any excessive carbon in from the atmosphere in various forms. It was only knocked out of kilter when MAN came along and started releasing it into the atmosphere. That had lots of effects, all adverse. To make matters worse, he removed most of the trees between the eastern seaboard and the Mississippi river in order to farm, and then he decided that, since he didn't really need all that grain, he'd feed it to animals that he eats, though their digestive systems weren't designed for grain, and then he had to start feeding them antibiotics too, which ultimately has made the antibiotics ineffective. He's getting what he deserves. Nature is patient. Clearly, God saw right away that he'd made a mistake and saw that man would ultimately self-destruct. I don't live in Texas, but I did once do a bit of shooting. 1200 FPS is extremely slow for rifle bullet. It's pistol and shotgun velocity. I gave away my old P. O. Ackley reference, else I'd quote you some fast ones. I do remember that my .220 Swift exceeded 4000 fps and the 22/250 routinely got into the 3500+ range, albeit with much lighter bullets. My military .308 (7.62mm NATO) had a muzzle velocity on the order of 2750 with its 165 grain fmj bullet, and some common .30-06 rounds exceed 3000 fps. Ralph Landon, back in the mid-70's, shot a world record 100-yard group with a rifle, (heavy varminter, 13.5 pounds) parts of which are still in my basement somewhere. The last elk I know he shot was dispatched at over 800 yards across a canyon with a 7 mm magnum with a muzzle velocity over 3200 fps and about a 160 grain bullet. I don't think the 1200 fps is far off what you'd get if you broke into my house at night, though the dogs would probably make the six-shooter entirely unnecessary. (I once lived in Oklahoma, though not too long.) I hung around Houston while working for NASA, too. That wasn't for long either. I didn't like neckties ... and still don't. RE |