Ever since I saw your posts for the first time, it's been obvious that you shill for KEIL.
"shill for KEIL"? HUH?? I have posted "their editor STINKS", "The IDE is not worth $#!^" in the above post "problems with the optimizer has been reported", if that is "shilling" then the moon is made of green cheese.

If you were looking for bugs, or even looking at the KEIL product with a critical eye, you'd have found a few of 'em by now.
I am not "looking for bugs" in a tool I pay dearly for, but can guarantee you that, if I find one, there is great noise. So,why do I not make "great noise" about the editor? simply because I do not consider it the job of a compiler maker to make a great editor and - besides - I already have one. Why do I not make "great noise" about the optimizer? simply because I could not imagine using one such. As opposed to you I DO NOT GIVE A HOOT ABOUT THINGS I DO NOT USE. I can visualize you driving a Chevy and making complaints about a defect in a Ford, what friggin concern of yours would that be.

If you expect me to "cease designing stuff we can sell in order to work the compiler to find bugs" you must be, at least, 40% more stupid than a hole in the ground.

Erik