??? 02/25/07 09:32 Modified: 02/25/07 09:40 Read: times |
#133662 - Spartan II is just out of choices Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
The Spartan-II series claims to have on-board tristate bus features. This is confusing to some and quite misleading. I think Suresh R was taken in by the marketing hype about tristate routing in these FPGA's and therefore attempted to use them in the same way as that in which one would use an external tristate buffer. Though it's possible to create a tristate data bus, for example, in Spartan-II it's not as simple as all that, AND ... there's a timing penalty.
RE Hi, To be frank i am just a beginner in this field and the selection of Spartan II is just out of choices :) regard's Suresh. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Simulation and Synthesis of verilog code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my comments on having a quick look | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if..else... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Changes to verilog code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
worst case?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Logical "Z" state, data buses, and more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not sure what happens in verilog but vhdl | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Verilog vs VHDL types | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But in the 8254 datasheet, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More on Verilog data buses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you Lynn! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
XILILNX is the problem! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Spartan II is just out of choices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There are good reasons for Spartan-II | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Altera is doubly unhelpful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where's the 805x? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well, he is fooling with a 8254 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"chat forum" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well, OK ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how was I to know that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mentioned in an earlier thread Erik., | 01/01/70 00:00 |