Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/21/06 03:20
Read: times


 
#129867 - The 8255A is stronger and faster than reported.
I have been characterizing the Intersil IS82C55AZ and have found it to be both faster and stronger than reported in the data sheet.

The Iol at Vol = 0.4v was measured at 14 mA at 5V and 25C. That implies a true spec of Iol = 8mA. The data sheet says Iol = 2.5mA.

The Ioh at Voh = Vdd - 0.4 was 10 mA. That implies a true spec of Ioh = 6mA. The data sheet says Ioh = 100uA.

The chip timing depends strongly on Vdd. At Vdd = 5V, I was seeing 40nS access times. That corresponds to a spec of 75nS. The data sheet says that access times are 120nS.

In other notes, the part worked down to about 1.5 volts, the date code was July, 2006, and the data sheet had a date of January, 2006.

From these measurements, it appears that the Intersil 82C55 would have no problem with working in the data space of the 8051 (12x clock) at almost any frequency.

And yet there have been many criticisms of the 8255 here. So, has the unhappiness with the 8255 been a result of reading the data sheet, or do they result from actual, recent experience?


List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
The 8255A is stronger and faster than reported.            01/01/70 00:00      
   The Data Sheet rules            01/01/70 00:00      
      How can we rely on that specification?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not proven!            01/01/70 00:00      
   who give s hoot what you have 'found'            01/01/70 00:00      
      Data sheets don' rule in reverse engineering            01/01/70 00:00      
         Does that mean...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I'm a chip provider, not a user            01/01/70 00:00      
               then do notstate "The 8255A is stronger and fast"            01/01/70 00:00      
                  8255 statements            01/01/70 00:00      
         They do determine what you have to deliver ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            What I Did            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hmmmm ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Measuring output DC parameters            01/01/70 00:00      
                     What did you really test?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        DC measurements            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That's why measurements are quick and automatic            01/01/70 00:00      
                              My paycheck?            01/01/70 00:00      
   No!            01/01/70 00:00      
   How?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Measuring Specs            01/01/70 00:00      
   Population v sample sigma            01/01/70 00:00      
      Should know better            01/01/70 00:00      
         Dangerous extrapolations            01/01/70 00:00      
      The other side of the looking glass            01/01/70 00:00      
   The timing issue was the delay ....            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks for the tip            01/01/70 00:00      
      8255            01/01/70 00:00      
         do these two things            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List