Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/05/06 05:18
Read: times


 		 #119644 - not with the statistics as they are
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I did point out the error to several of the contributors, but, though they said they'd look into it and get back to me, they didn't.

Xilinx also has published a couple of "app notes" that define Manchester code exactly the opposite of the IEEE 802.3 standard.

Frankly, I've never relied on the Wikipedia, and have always felt obliged to corroborate whatever I find there, often finding it inconsistent with other, seemingly more reliable sources, hence, I've not involved myself.

I guess everyone has the right to be wrong ... even the Wikipedia.

RE


List of 47 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
lets cool it guys,eric ;)            01/01/70 00:00      
   I agree            01/01/70 00:00      
      However ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         I generally agree            01/01/70 00:00      
            I know I'm annoying...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Why?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  absolutely            01/01/70 00:00      
                  wikiwiki            01/01/70 00:00      
                     modified WIKI            01/01/70 00:00      
                        try!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Compromise            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I think such should be considered in thi            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Follow-up            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I like compromises like these            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wiki quality            01/01/70 00:00      
               That's a dangerous and slippery slope!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     There was a recent subject on NPR            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wiki accuracy            01/01/70 00:00      
                     wiki edit.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Some Wikipedia entries have been wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
                        wiki is freedom            01/01/70 00:00      
                           not with the statistics as they are            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Yes, the freedom to be wrong, in public!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 It's just as Ronald Reagan said ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            faqs...as pdf            01/01/70 00:00      
            agree            01/01/70 00:00      
   There has been more damage done via this            01/01/70 00:00      
   a reference            01/01/70 00:00      
   Boy oh boy Did you hit the nail on head            01/01/70 00:00      
      maybe go a little further?            01/01/70 00:00      
         maybe relax it a bit            01/01/70 00:00      
            However, if the thread were closed, but            01/01/70 00:00      
               Already exists            01/01/70 00:00      
                  This is not so simple ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Yes, cool it..            01/01/70 00:00      
      there are no stupid questions            01/01/70 00:00      
   Ok, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
      How to learn then ?            01/01/70 00:00      
         By comparing            01/01/70 00:00      
            Exactly!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Do you reckon ?            01/01/70 00:00      
               fill the new posting entry window with H            01/01/70 00:00      
               There's a reason            01/01/70 00:00      
                  how do you know            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It's my cynicism that tells me.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List