Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/03/10 17:33
Read: times


 
#173786 - can-openers
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Ralph Sac said:
Example can opener, I very sure this is patented.

Quite likely, there is not just one "Can Opener" patent - but many different patents on different aspects of the can-opener.

If you look in a kitchenware store, you will see that there are severally fundamentally different approaches to the task of opening a can!

After the can opener was invented then came the pop top tab and then the tab that sayed on the can which are all inprovement on the original idea of the can opener.

No, I don't think they are at all - they are ideas that obviate the need for a can opener!

It is quite likely that the "stay-on" tabs use some of the ideas of the "original" ring-pull - so they couldn't re-patent that, and they'd have to agree terms on that part.
They could only patent the novel part; ie, the means of making it stay on.

What happens to the first inventor of the can opener as far money commensation?

Unfortunately for him, his invention has been rendered redundant - so that's the end of his income stream!

List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
I don't understand why Patents?            01/01/70 00:00      
   it would be the ultimate stupidity            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have you considered chronology?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Agents            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not obligatory            01/01/70 00:00      
            But you beg to have one...            01/01/70 00:00      
   The idea            01/01/70 00:00      
   Do you want to build a hearing aid?            01/01/70 00:00      
    The purpose of the patent ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      So what you are basically saying            01/01/70 00:00      
         No            01/01/70 00:00      
         That's not an *Invention*            01/01/70 00:00      
         Purpose of patent            01/01/70 00:00      
            patents are a complete quagmire to suck in the unwary            01/01/70 00:00      
               Never go to court to enforce a patent            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe not so much            01/01/70 00:00      
               Letters Patent            01/01/70 00:00      
   Source code in patents            01/01/70 00:00      
      In England            01/01/70 00:00      
   Beware of trivialising what you don't understand!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Think about it...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Now how does this work            01/01/70 00:00      
         can-openers            01/01/70 00:00      
         What often happens..            01/01/70 00:00      
            What happens in U.S.A.            01/01/70 00:00      
               What happens in the USA ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yep            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I should make it clearer            01/01/70 00:00      
   Invention v Implementation            01/01/70 00:00      
      "Design Patents" - US-specific?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Similar in Germany...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List