Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/02/10 20:02
Read: times


 
#173743 - I don't understand why Patents?
Hi to all members:

When you look up a patent an example would be" Digital Hearing Aids". You are given list of all digital hearing aids with inventors names. In this example their are 50 patents. The full patent describes the invention in so much detail had to be written by a lawyer or a lawyer rewrote it. Then you are given 16 pages of the document with pictures of the invention. But this is the part I don't understand? Their no mention of Dsp chips or processor type or resistor vaules or cap. vaules, software source code either. And some of the idea's from inventors seem to cross over their idea's. You can only do so much with a digital hearing aid since its a very small device. Example mic, processor or dsp, two or three A/D converters, potenimeter, analog converter some type special speaker, switch, battery and case design. I don't even understand how their is 50 patents on digital hearing aids? You would think their could be know more then 10 because you can not do that much with the design. Also is the source code, processor type, or ic type hidden some where where only the patent office can see it. This is the most confusing part to me. Can some member please explain these questions that I wrote in this thread. Thanks for any idea's you may have on this subject.

Best regards,

Ralph Sac

List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
I don't understand why Patents?            01/01/70 00:00      
   it would be the ultimate stupidity            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have you considered chronology?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Agents            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not obligatory            01/01/70 00:00      
            But you beg to have one...            01/01/70 00:00      
   The idea            01/01/70 00:00      
   Do you want to build a hearing aid?            01/01/70 00:00      
    The purpose of the patent ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      So what you are basically saying            01/01/70 00:00      
         No            01/01/70 00:00      
         That's not an *Invention*            01/01/70 00:00      
         Purpose of patent            01/01/70 00:00      
            patents are a complete quagmire to suck in the unwary            01/01/70 00:00      
               Never go to court to enforce a patent            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe not so much            01/01/70 00:00      
               Letters Patent            01/01/70 00:00      
   Source code in patents            01/01/70 00:00      
      In England            01/01/70 00:00      
   Beware of trivialising what you don't understand!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Think about it...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Now how does this work            01/01/70 00:00      
         can-openers            01/01/70 00:00      
         What often happens..            01/01/70 00:00      
            What happens in U.S.A.            01/01/70 00:00      
               What happens in the USA ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yep            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I should make it clearer            01/01/70 00:00      
   Invention v Implementation            01/01/70 00:00      
      "Design Patents" - US-specific?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Similar in Germany...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List