Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/03/10 15:38
Read: times


 
#173780 - Invention v Implementation
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi Ralph,

In a nutshell, the patent protects the idea, not the implementation of the idea. It is, after all, the idea that you're patenting, not the implementation of that idea.

If someone else, after you've protected your idea with patent registration, accomplishes the same thing, then they've violated your patent even if they came up with a wholly different implementation. On the other hand, if they can show that they improved upon your idea, then that improvment becomes their patent.

There's something else you should watch for regarding patents. There are utility patents, which are what everyone thinks of when they think of patents, and there are design patents, which are not.

Despite what you may think, design patents have everything to do with creativity and nothing to do with invention. A design patent is essentially copyrighting any feature or characteristic of something that is strictly asthetic, that has no bearing on the function of the device.

I saw a good example of the object lesson in this several years ago on a late night infomercial. Some scam artist was selling something called a "Q-Ray" bracelet. He claimed that it performed some sort of miracle-invigorating-rejuvenating-healing nonsense via something that he was calling "Q-rays." It was a bracelet with several metal wires twisted together in a rope fashion and bent into a C-shape. Metal balls terminated the ends. It was to be slipped over the wrist.

More importantly it was a complete and unvarnished scam. The seller made sure that everyone knew it was patented by repeating loudly and often that it was protected by Patent # blah-blah-blah issued by the United States Patent Office.

The point is that his patent was a design patent, not a utility patent, but the seller made certain that his targeted audience got the impression that his product was some kind of new invention.

Forewarned is forearmed. When someone says that something is patented, make sure you know exactly what is, and more importantly what is not, patented. Even if someone has a utility patent, you can still use that as a basis from which to make improvements.

Joe


List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
I don't understand why Patents?            01/01/70 00:00      
   it would be the ultimate stupidity            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have you considered chronology?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Agents            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not obligatory            01/01/70 00:00      
            But you beg to have one...            01/01/70 00:00      
   The idea            01/01/70 00:00      
   Do you want to build a hearing aid?            01/01/70 00:00      
    The purpose of the patent ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      So what you are basically saying            01/01/70 00:00      
         No            01/01/70 00:00      
         That's not an *Invention*            01/01/70 00:00      
         Purpose of patent            01/01/70 00:00      
            patents are a complete quagmire to suck in the unwary            01/01/70 00:00      
               Never go to court to enforce a patent            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe not so much            01/01/70 00:00      
               Letters Patent            01/01/70 00:00      
   Source code in patents            01/01/70 00:00      
      In England            01/01/70 00:00      
   Beware of trivialising what you don't understand!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Think about it...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Now how does this work            01/01/70 00:00      
         can-openers            01/01/70 00:00      
         What often happens..            01/01/70 00:00      
            What happens in U.S.A.            01/01/70 00:00      
               What happens in the USA ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yep            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I should make it clearer            01/01/70 00:00      
   Invention v Implementation            01/01/70 00:00      
      "Design Patents" - US-specific?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Similar in Germany...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List