??? 03/03/10 00:44 Read: times |
#173756 - So what you are basically saying Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
It's supposed to describe in detail what the patent claims as an invention, but it's not supposed to give complete engineering details. It's supposed to tell you what he's done and how that is unique, but the reason he's allowed to keep his patent is because he's told you what the law requires him to tell you. The idea behind this is to promote technological progress.
If you're smart enough to understand what he's done, you can take his idea and improve on it. The patent is supposed to further progress but not promote reverse-engineering. If you replicate even in a very general sense, what he's done, without improvement or major changes, you're subject to infringement penalties. Of course, it's up to him, the inventor and patent-holder, to protect his patent. His patent may also expose him to suit by prior inventotrs. The patent office sometimes fails to notice that. RE Hi Richard: Lets see if I understand your quote. Some inventor build a 555 timer and 4017 counter to sequence 8 leds. I build similar circuit using 89c2051 core part that uses that and 8 leds which uses less power and less current but does the same function. So now I can patent my idea if want to for 2-10K for patent right. Is that about it. Best regards, Ralph Sac |