Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/02/10 20:36
Read: times


 		 #173745 - it would be the ultimate stupidity
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Their no mention of Dsp chips or processor type or resistor vaules or cap. vaules, software source code either.

It would be the ultimate stupidity to "mention of Dsp chips or processor type or resistor vaules or cap. vaules", if that was done the patent could be broken by changing a cap or a resistor.

I recall a patent that simply said "tracking baseline drift by ..." no components, just the method. That is a GOOD patent.

A flip-dot patent that specified the shape of the cutout in the flipper for the LED behind it was written so specific that a competitor could legally break it just by changing the shape of the cutout.

Erik

List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
I don't understand why Patents?            01/01/70 00:00      
   it would be the ultimate stupidity            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have you considered chronology?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Agents            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not obligatory            01/01/70 00:00      
            But you beg to have one...            01/01/70 00:00      
   The idea            01/01/70 00:00      
   Do you want to build a hearing aid?            01/01/70 00:00      
    The purpose of the patent ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      So what you are basically saying            01/01/70 00:00      
         No            01/01/70 00:00      
         That's not an *Invention*            01/01/70 00:00      
         Purpose of patent            01/01/70 00:00      
            patents are a complete quagmire to suck in the unwary            01/01/70 00:00      
               Never go to court to enforce a patent            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe not so much            01/01/70 00:00      
               Letters Patent            01/01/70 00:00      
   Source code in patents            01/01/70 00:00      
      In England            01/01/70 00:00      
   Beware of trivialising what you don't understand!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Think about it...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Now how does this work            01/01/70 00:00      
         can-openers            01/01/70 00:00      
         What often happens..            01/01/70 00:00      
            What happens in U.S.A.            01/01/70 00:00      
               What happens in the USA ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yep            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I should make it clearer            01/01/70 00:00      
   Invention v Implementation            01/01/70 00:00      
      "Design Patents" - US-specific?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Similar in Germany...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List