Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/19/07 02:58
Read: times


 		 #144775 - another reason 2
Responding to: ???'s previous message
(at the same time)

This mean the slave sent with interval.
Did I said polling by master before?


(Master --at X and Y(cables) get response from)

(<---Slave(1))
....
(<---Slave(16))

Slaves sent response after get their polling...so the XY was
filled by signal slaves routing.
This didn't cause the collision.

(This mean the Master was full duplex and slave(waiting their command response from Master)).

Sorry folks,This mean mimic fullduplex.




List of 46 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
MCS-51 and RS485            01/01/70 00:00      
   Specifics?            01/01/70 00:00      
   not enough clear            01/01/70 00:00      
   RS485 code at code library didn't work's            01/01/70 00:00      
   .ASM or .C code nevermind            01/01/70 00:00      
      But what do you need it to do?            01/01/70 00:00      
         485 master slave            01/01/70 00:00      
            I did            01/01/70 00:00      
               RS-485 master/slave code.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Try Modbus            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Oops sorry,Must using uart with another mode.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RS-485 code            01/01/70 00:00      
      Full duplex?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Full duplex ...the reasons            01/01/70 00:00      
            That's not a reason!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Technically            01/01/70 00:00      
               another reason            01/01/70 00:00      
                  maybe You need Ethernet?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Another issue...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  wrong? not really, but wasteful            01/01/70 00:00      
                  another reason 2            01/01/70 00:00      
                     there is no 'same time'            01/01/70 00:00      
                        OK there wasn't same but....            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Asynchronous?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           if I understand what you are saying            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Something like this            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Modbus            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    swicth to modbus            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Sample code            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    References            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 collisions            01/01/70 00:00      
   try 30 baud            01/01/70 00:00      
   Before jumping to pool named as "modbus"            01/01/70 00:00      
      You have a calculator!            01/01/70 00:00      
         what a waste of bandwith            01/01/70 00:00      
            Tradeoff            01/01/70 00:00      
               There is overhead you can save with no ill effect            01/01/70 00:00      
                  The point is...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     modbus exist does not make it pantyhose            01/01/70 00:00      
                        For a beginner...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Getting wet with modbus by drag from Russel            01/01/70 00:00      
   AT89S8252 and AT89S52            01/01/70 00:00      
      Nope!            01/01/70 00:00      
         AT89S5X with 24LC02            01/01/70 00:00      
            Lot of work??            01/01/70 00:00      
            Quoting previous posts            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List