??? 02/19/07 13:56 Read: times |
#133241 - Is that the same Webster's ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Guten Tag Christopher,
Is that the same Websters that tells us the definitions of irregardless, and ain't? Note too that they incorrectly cite "ain't" as a contraction of "are not." "Aren't" is the contraction of "are not." "Ain't" is the slang contraction of "am not," originating in the drawled dialects of the U.S. antebellum deep south. If they haven't yet, I doubt if it will be long before they list "nu'•cyah•ler" as a legitimate pronunciation of "nuclear." Joe |