Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/05/06 12:28
Modified:
  06/05/06 12:32
Read: times


 
Msg Score: -1
 -1 Answer is Wrong		 #117742 - I cahllemge you
Responding to: ???'s previous message
most eval versions are made with many restrictions so that user wont be able to know whether there are hidden problems in a real version...and of course, after buying and finding a bug, will be simply send some patch "for free" and when that another bug is found, another patch will be delivered and thats again "for free"....and this will continue until an email announcing that they will no more support their "so and so version" but has just developed a new version...with its demo version for free...and real one for..so and so dollars....and so this cycle continues until may be after the user empties his pockets...
thats the rule of the business, I guess...
....................
hey but I have nothing against Keil's anyway...till now...

I challenge you to state a problem you have found with the core functionality of Keil.

Yes, the simulator may not support a USB emulator, the RTX51 may not be able to switch tasks exactly like you want, you may have to make your own .h file for a new device - WGASA. Tell me ONE malfunction - not inconvenience - of the core Keil tools: compiler, assembler and linker.

FYI: I am, in no way, except as a user, associated with Keil and I intensly hate their "IDE integration" attempts, they try to "integrate" debugging their way and do not allow you to "integrate" a decent compiler and thus force you to pay for an IDE you can not use. That said, I love the compiler, assembler and linker.

Erik

List of 39 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Keilc51 demo version is far too limited            01/01/70 00:00      
   Bona fide?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Raisonance limit is 4k            01/01/70 00:00      
   thats what demo versions are for            01/01/70 00:00      
      I cahllemge you            01/01/70 00:00      
         amazing deduction            01/01/70 00:00      
   hmmm            01/01/70 00:00      
      The 805x series has "gotten away"            01/01/70 00:00      
      Pot. Kettle. Black.            01/01/70 00:00      
         ha ha ha            01/01/70 00:00      
   maybe....            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's why SDCC is preferable            01/01/70 00:00      
         Keil lifetime and SDCC?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Room for improvement.            01/01/70 00:00      
               It happens            01/01/70 00:00      
   the eval is purely a misnomer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Marketingspeak            01/01/70 00:00      
         Well, maybe he's a shill ... or a pimp            01/01/70 00:00      
            what is "device support?" for a compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes, that's part of it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Pow, smack, whack...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     when you get what you need who cares abo            01/01/70 00:00      
                        You're absolutely right ... sadly enough            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Wrong tool            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you overstate greatly            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 consider the one-clocker            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I have heard/read they kind of do            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       but only "sort-of"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          derivative specific and general            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             They should admit they don't            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                the problem is            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   That's not where the argument should be            01/01/70 00:00      
                              It's probably less than that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 One more thing ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
   well anyway            01/01/70 00:00      
      Open Source            01/01/70 00:00      
         of course,once ive finished everything            01/01/70 00:00      
   wickenhaeuser compiler            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List