Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/02/06 21:43
Read: times


 		 #117650 - Keilc51 demo version is far too limited
I was just looking at the limitations of the demo version and it cannot compile or link anything more than 2 Kbytes in size,doesn't support user libraries,doesnt support floating point,doesnt support dual data pointers doesnt produce lst files,it may be me but when i want to try out some demo i expect some limitations otherwise you wouldnt buy the full version but,I was just wondering on what basis you are expected to come to any conclusions using this demo version about its performance.

List of 39 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Keilc51 demo version is far too limited            01/01/70 00:00      
   Bona fide?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Raisonance limit is 4k            01/01/70 00:00      
   thats what demo versions are for            01/01/70 00:00      
      I cahllemge you            01/01/70 00:00      
         amazing deduction            01/01/70 00:00      
   hmmm            01/01/70 00:00      
      The 805x series has "gotten away"            01/01/70 00:00      
      Pot. Kettle. Black.            01/01/70 00:00      
         ha ha ha            01/01/70 00:00      
   maybe....            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's why SDCC is preferable            01/01/70 00:00      
         Keil lifetime and SDCC?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Room for improvement.            01/01/70 00:00      
               It happens            01/01/70 00:00      
   the eval is purely a misnomer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Marketingspeak            01/01/70 00:00      
         Well, maybe he's a shill ... or a pimp            01/01/70 00:00      
            what is "device support?" for a compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes, that's part of it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Pow, smack, whack...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     when you get what you need who cares abo            01/01/70 00:00      
                        You're absolutely right ... sadly enough            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Wrong tool            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you overstate greatly            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 consider the one-clocker            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I have heard/read they kind of do            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       but only "sort-of"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          derivative specific and general            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             They should admit they don't            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                the problem is            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   That's not where the argument should be            01/01/70 00:00      
                              It's probably less than that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 One more thing ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
   well anyway            01/01/70 00:00      
      Open Source            01/01/70 00:00      
         of course,once ive finished everything            01/01/70 00:00      
   wickenhaeuser compiler            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List