??? 07/21/09 16:07 Read: times |
#167666 - Not such a good idea Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Joseph Hebert said:
[...] I suggest that you make the top and bottom layers your power/ground planes [...] While that may work for an all through-hole board, for an SMT board like Lucas' it's a definite no-no. For a ground plane to work effectively, it must be as uninterrupted as possible and there is just no way to achieve that on the component layer of an SMT board. Also, keep your signal traces away from the edges of the planes (fringing effects). That is sound advice :-). |
Topic | Author | Date |
PCB design - ground plate... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
excuse... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You can use a local ground plane, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So, if I understand it well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, of course, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No overlap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Version B, but without FB... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PCB layout... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Answers... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
EMC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hhm, I wouldn't do that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AC power supply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ground vias | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Locating of vias... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you very much... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sideplating? Thermal vias? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Stackup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not such a good idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
interrupted/split planes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nice link, Rob! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What you propose isn't well suited for 4 layer boards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hi Kai![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |