| ??? 04/06/09 11:02 Read: times |
#164390 - dismissive Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Ap Charles said:
You told me that I dismissed summitek.com module by calling it a "TOY" Yes, I think calling it a "TOY" is dismissive. now summitek.com being not as bright as nRFxx need not be called as dismissal in the first place by you. No, I did not dismiss it at all; on the contrary, I said:
But if he wants a toy, then the Taiwanese one is better! Perhaps I should have said, I said:
But if he wants a toy, then the Taiwanese one is better for him! If the advanced features of the "brighter" part are not required by the application, then those features are of no advantage to that application and so they do not make it "better" for that application - especially if they add cost and complexity. Again; please note that the above is conditional: it does not mean that the case is established - it just shows that there is a possibility that it might be so. |
