| ??? 04/06/09 10:25 Read: times |
#164388 - It looks fiction Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Ap Charles said:
I just happen to make a comparitive analysis No, you didn't. You just said, "Nordic Transceiver was far better" You did not give any consideration to possible disadvantages - principally higher cost and complexity. Note, again, the use of "possibly": I didn't say that they would necessarily disqualify the part - just that they are issues that need to be considered & evaluated in line with the (unknwon) project requirements. The (possibly) higher cost and complexity may well be justified by the other benefits - but only the OP can tell that! It looks fiction , OP is not serious with this thread . In my earlier posts I did tell OP he would require antenna to be networked irrespective to what ever the Nordic Specs says , isnt this a dis advantage? . In the first place it looks like he has no experience with RF designs . No dismissal You don't consider describing something as a "TOY" to be a dismissal, then? If a person has two sons A,B . If A is not as bright as B you in the first place cannot call that as dismissal . You told me that I dismissed summitek.com module by calling it a "TOY" ,now summitek.com being not as bright as nRFxx need not be called as dismissal in the first place by you. You may say I call summitek module inferior and nRFxx module superior to it or better , yest I still do. OP is free to use any . -Ap |
