??? 02/21/12 14:33 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#186104 - but, at least Responding to: ???'s previous message |
But it's the same chip, irrespective of the volumes the partucular customer is using.
If no high-volume customer has reported a particular bug yet, they're probably not affected by it (since they don't use that particular function/peripheral of the chip, for example), and engineering hours and the cost associated with producing a new revision spent on fixing it would essentially be wasted. Even worse, releasing a new revision of the chip might rouse suspicions I can see the argument for not respinning the chip if no high volume users are affected. But a lot of "egg in the face" can be saved by actually verifying that the bug exist and include it in the errata. What if some company buys 1,000,000 chips and then report the bug the low volume user reported? Erik |