??? 11/12/09 15:52 Read: times |
#170738 - Better to have them.. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Chico,
Chico said:
If I dont care the output state during reset, can I omit 74HC04? As Richard already mentioned, it's not wise to drive loads with the reset level of micro. There are situations, where the reset supervisory chip can keep the micro resetted for a long time. Would you like all your loads including two heavy laser modules staying uncontrolledly turned on for a long time? Believe me, that's no good idea. Another issue is the input capacitance of MOSFET. If you omit the 74HCMOS driver, you would need two resistors, one pull-up to turn the MOSFET reliably on and one to limit the discharging current of gate source capacitance into the micro when it tries to turn the MOSFET off. Without a current limiting a huge ground bounce would be the result, eventually stopping the micro from running properly. The resulting scheme with two resistors in combination with a standard quasi-bidirectional port line has other disadvantages. So, if you really want to drive the MOSFET with a logic high, put two 74HC04 inverters in series. Chico said:
And, can I use IRF640/630 instead? Following the datasheet, Vgs of IRF630/640 is up to 4V (3V typically) for a source drain current of only 250µA. So, some of them might work, others not. Give it a try, but order a better one for your final product. Eventually, you should add a free wheeling diode to your laser module. Depends on actual circuitry of laser module. Kai Klaas |