Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/08/09 16:07
Read: times


 
#165157 - I Agree with you..but...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
...He just replaced the AT89S52 with AT89C52 and the problem was solved.

I do not want to go deeper into this. But here goes the story...

A few years back, I had designed an Industrial process Timer, used in mainly Injection Moulding machines in the Ejector Section. This is a AT89C52 Based product.

Due to (temporary) unavailabitly of AT89C52, I suggested my customer to use AT89S52. The Hex file was the same that was used for AT89C52. But almost 16 products came back for noise problem. He verified it that it was noise problem. So he purchased AT89C52 at a higher price from the market and fired the same Hex file, placed the AT89C52 back into the very same products (so no question about decoupling, PCB design, etc..) and the problem dissapeared. It just proved that AT89C52 is better than AT89S52 as far as noise is concerned. Same was done for P89C52X2BN, Even this IC failed terribly, AT89S52 was better than P89C52X2BN, And AT89C52 was better than AT89S52.

Now my customer is happy using AT89C52 (even at higher $$), and since all are happy, I do not want to dig further and waste my time after it. So I said that I do not want to go deeper into it.

Anyway thanks for your replies..
from Kiran V Sutar, Mumbai, INDIA

List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Does anybody has experience with Freescale?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Freescale was Motorola            01/01/70 00:00      
      Have been using MPC (PPC) processors            01/01/70 00:00      
         8051 chips from Freescale            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thanks for correcting...Andy Neil            01/01/70 00:00      
               I thought it was Per?!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Quite possible            01/01/70 00:00      
   I doubt it            01/01/70 00:00      
      well, so let's state it in other way            01/01/70 00:00      
         i missed that one, but am still right            01/01/70 00:00      
      I Agree with you..but...            01/01/70 00:00      
         the trouble is...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes..true            01/01/70 00:00      
               nothing to do with noise            01/01/70 00:00      
                  This thread was started Not for Noise Problem            01/01/70 00:00      
            not pin compatible            01/01/70 00:00      
         i do not agree with You...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I think the point is elsewhere...            01/01/70 00:00      
            The reason for Freescale..            01/01/70 00:00      
               What chip?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  No Information Yet            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Always good to get help sifting through the alternatives            01/01/70 00:00      
               ok,            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Errata can be problematic            01/01/70 00:00      
               Be sure to consider all cost implications            01/01/70 00:00      
         Really?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Good enough sometimes the best choice            01/01/70 00:00      
         incorrect            01/01/70 00:00      
   No surprises there, then!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes..that's why I started this thread            01/01/70 00:00      
   re:Freescale            01/01/70 00:00      
   There's more features at freescale            01/01/70 00:00      
      Please explain            01/01/70 00:00      
      Freescale has huge amounts of processors            01/01/70 00:00      
         Freescale is Motorola            01/01/70 00:00      
            Neutral name of supplier            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List