Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/11/06 09:32
Read: times


 
#129275 - Did you actually read it?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Abhishek Singh said:
atleast wikipedia defines bits per second. it says
In less formal contexts the abbreviations "b/s" or "bps" are often used, though this risks confusion with "bytes per second" ("B/s", "Bps").

My emphasis added - as this was precisely my point!

or here also(many other places) similar defintion can be seen.
http://wireless.about.com/cs/basicn...ef_bps.htm

That site says,
Because eight-bit byte architectures dominate today, converting from Bps to bps involves only multiplying by eight. However, it's too easy to confuse the two acronyms and best to use 'bps' consistently.


Again, my point is that people can't even get the capitalisation right on well-defined formal symbols like k/K or s/S - so it is impossible to rely on any consistent use of this informal convention!


List of 33 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
accessing the modes of parallel port            01/01/70 00:00      
   A bit off-topic?            01/01/70 00:00      
      DCBs            01/01/70 00:00      
         In Windows...            01/01/70 00:00      
         DCB?            01/01/70 00:00      
            DCB            01/01/70 00:00      
               CP2102            01/01/70 00:00      
                  The hardest part of using the CP2102            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Modules            01/01/70 00:00      
                  need of the parallel port            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Misunderstanding?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Re-analyze your requirment            01/01/70 00:00      
                     real-time?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        latency and jitter            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Inadequately specified            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Figures            01/01/70 00:00      
   This might Help            01/01/70 00:00      
   USB?            01/01/70 00:00      
   there are ways ... but be careful            01/01/70 00:00      
      Bps?            01/01/70 00:00      
         bits            01/01/70 00:00      
         By definition            01/01/70 00:00      
            What definition?            01/01/70 00:00      
               at least wikipedia            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Did you actually read it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     yes            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Bits and bytes            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Typo, of sorts.            01/01/70 00:00      
               bits vs bytes            01/01/70 00:00      
                  even worse, do you remember            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Husker Du            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Common            01/01/70 00:00      
         Nope ...it\'s BYTES            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List