??? 12/11/06 00:20 Read: times |
#129260 - Figures Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Shankar G said:
all other ports i.e. the USB, serial ports have some delays Of course, the parallel port also has delays - setup time before the strobe, strobe width, and hold time after the strobe. Joseph Hebert said:
a USB 2.0 port is 480 Mbits per second, or 60 MBytes per second. Richard Erlacher said:
EPP is capable of transferring data at about a 2 MBps rate on the ISA bus. Naturally, this can't be sustained So, relative to the EPP parallel port, USB is looking pretty fast - the delays will be over an order of magnitude greater with a PC Parallel Port! |
Topic | Author | Date |
accessing the modes of parallel port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A bit off-topic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DCBs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In Windows... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DCB? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DCB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CP2102 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The hardest part of using the CP2102 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Modules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
need of the parallel port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Misunderstanding? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re-analyze your requirment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
real-time? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
latency and jitter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Inadequately specified | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Figures | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This might Help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
USB? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there are ways ... but be careful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bps? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
By definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What definition? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
at least wikipedia | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Did you actually read it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bits and bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Typo, of sorts. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bits vs bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
even worse, do you remember | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Husker Du | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Common | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nope ...it\'s BYTES | 01/01/70 00:00 |