| ??? 12/10/06 16:05 Read: times |
#129250 - Re-analyze your requirment Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Shankar,
I agree with Andy. I think you might do well to re-analyze your requirements, starting by finding out how much throughput you can expect from a parallel port. The theoretical limit for a USB 2.0 port is 480 Mbits per second, or 60 MBytes per second. Can you really get anything close to that through a parallel port? For the record, I'm not saying that you can't because I haven't looked into it. I will say I have serious doubts that you can. Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| accessing the modes of parallel port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A bit off-topic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DCBs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In Windows... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DCB? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DCB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CP2102 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The hardest part of using the CP2102 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Modules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| need of the parallel port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Misunderstanding? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re-analyze your requirment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| real-time? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| latency and jitter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Inadequately specified | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Figures | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This might Help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| USB? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there are ways ... but be careful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bps? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| By definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What definition? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| at least wikipedia | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you actually read it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bits and bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Typo, of sorts. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bits vs bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even worse, do you remember | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Husker Du | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nope ...it\'s BYTES | 01/01/70 00:00 |