Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/08/06 17:07
Read: times


 
#129183 - that is a shortfall.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The timings are the important things once one is into the details. "Logic Circuits" as it's called in many institution is not taught from the standpoint of circuit design for real-world implementation. What's more, one can hardly get most of the old "74xx" series logic. (when was the last time you saw a 74xx133, or a 74xx148, ...) Programmable logic is the current "thing" and costs less, is faster, etc.

Old habits die hard, though, and using a 74xx00 as a negative logic OR when we still, in our minds' eye, see that "dot" on the output of a NAND gate, is a difficult thing. If you draw it as an OR with the two bubbles on its inputs rather than as an AND with a bubble on its output, it's more clear in terms of logic, but not in terms of what you used. Now that it's all programmable logic, all that matters is the function, which should be easy to create either way.

RE


List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
all agree on clarity of code, why the resistance t            01/01/70 00:00      
   I totally agree, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
      I did not            01/01/70 00:00      
         Haha..            01/01/70 00:00      
      the author said, "Here there be dragons"            01/01/70 00:00      
         Only if the input is true low            01/01/70 00:00      
            Isn't that what the article says?            01/01/70 00:00      
   interestingly...            01/01/70 00:00      
      to each his own            01/01/70 00:00      
         tilde ~ for active low signals            01/01/70 00:00      
         The tilde was pooh-poohed in the '70's            01/01/70 00:00      
      Tilde as a logical negation            01/01/70 00:00      
         Deja vu all over again            01/01/70 00:00      
         Its just the same reason that lynn has .            01/01/70 00:00      
         yes, is that not the ultimate stupidity of the sch            01/01/70 00:00      
            Logic! Philosophy? Electronics? It's still a rose.            01/01/70 00:00      
   DeMorgans theorem in a nutshell            01/01/70 00:00      
      very good, but what are you?            01/01/70 00:00      
   NOT(short OR fat)            01/01/70 00:00      
      NOT OR?            01/01/70 00:00      
         AND...            01/01/70 00:00      
            ... but is he BALD?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Would hardly make a difference...            01/01/70 00:00      
   I may be wrong but i get the impression            01/01/70 00:00      
      oh yes, I recall            01/01/70 00:00      
   that is a shortfall.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List