Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/08/06 16:58
Read: times


 		 #129182 - Isn't that what the article says?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
the "dot" should, in theory, only apply to signals that "active" low. Presumably, that's what's being addressed. Isn't that what "positive logic" means, when applied to a specific gate?

As the guy says, "Here there be dragons."

RE


List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
all agree on clarity of code, why the resistance t            01/01/70 00:00      
   I totally agree, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
      I did not            01/01/70 00:00      
         Haha..            01/01/70 00:00      
      the author said, "Here there be dragons"            01/01/70 00:00      
         Only if the input is true low            01/01/70 00:00      
            Isn't that what the article says?            01/01/70 00:00      
   interestingly...            01/01/70 00:00      
      to each his own            01/01/70 00:00      
         tilde ~ for active low signals            01/01/70 00:00      
         The tilde was pooh-poohed in the '70's            01/01/70 00:00      
      Tilde as a logical negation            01/01/70 00:00      
         Deja vu all over again            01/01/70 00:00      
         Its just the same reason that lynn has .            01/01/70 00:00      
         yes, is that not the ultimate stupidity of the sch            01/01/70 00:00      
            Logic! Philosophy? Electronics? It's still a rose.            01/01/70 00:00      
   DeMorgans theorem in a nutshell            01/01/70 00:00      
      very good, but what are you?            01/01/70 00:00      
   NOT(short OR fat)            01/01/70 00:00      
      NOT OR?            01/01/70 00:00      
         AND...            01/01/70 00:00      
            ... but is he BALD?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Would hardly make a difference...            01/01/70 00:00      
   I may be wrong but i get the impression            01/01/70 00:00      
      oh yes, I recall            01/01/70 00:00      
   that is a shortfall.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List