Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/04/06 13:15
Read: times


 		 #128911 - Only if the input is true low
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The author of this article seems to believe that the "DOT" belongs at the input on an inverting buffer

The article, and common sense, states that if TRUE is low, there should be a dot.

Erik

List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
all agree on clarity of code, why the resistance t            01/01/70 00:00      
   I totally agree, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
      I did not            01/01/70 00:00      
         Haha..            01/01/70 00:00      
      the author said, "Here there be dragons"            01/01/70 00:00      
         Only if the input is true low            01/01/70 00:00      
            Isn't that what the article says?            01/01/70 00:00      
   interestingly...            01/01/70 00:00      
      to each his own            01/01/70 00:00      
         tilde ~ for active low signals            01/01/70 00:00      
         The tilde was pooh-poohed in the '70's            01/01/70 00:00      
      Tilde as a logical negation            01/01/70 00:00      
         Deja vu all over again            01/01/70 00:00      
         Its just the same reason that lynn has .            01/01/70 00:00      
         yes, is that not the ultimate stupidity of the sch            01/01/70 00:00      
            Logic! Philosophy? Electronics? It's still a rose.            01/01/70 00:00      
   DeMorgans theorem in a nutshell            01/01/70 00:00      
      very good, but what are you?            01/01/70 00:00      
   NOT(short OR fat)            01/01/70 00:00      
      NOT OR?            01/01/70 00:00      
         AND...            01/01/70 00:00      
            ... but is he BALD?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Would hardly make a difference...            01/01/70 00:00      
   I may be wrong but i get the impression            01/01/70 00:00      
      oh yes, I recall            01/01/70 00:00      
   that is a shortfall.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List