Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 12/01/06 15:48 Read: times	#128847 - NOT(short OR fat) Responding to: ???'s previous message

List of 26 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
all agree on clarity of code, why the resistance t		01/01/70 00:00
I totally agree, but...		01/01/70 00:00
I did not		01/01/70 00:00
Haha..		01/01/70 00:00
the author said, "Here there be dragons"		01/01/70 00:00
Only if the input is true low		01/01/70 00:00
Isn't that what the article says?		01/01/70 00:00
interestingly...		01/01/70 00:00
to each his own		01/01/70 00:00
tilde ~ for active low signals		01/01/70 00:00
The tilde was pooh-poohed in the '70's		01/01/70 00:00
Tilde as a logical negation		01/01/70 00:00
Deja vu all over again		01/01/70 00:00
Its just the same reason that lynn has .		01/01/70 00:00
yes, is that not the ultimate stupidity of the sch		01/01/70 00:00
Logic! Philosophy? Electronics? It's still a rose.		01/01/70 00:00
DeMorgans theorem in a nutshell		01/01/70 00:00
very good, but what are you?		01/01/70 00:00
NOT(short OR fat)		01/01/70 00:00
NOT OR?		01/01/70 00:00
AND...		01/01/70 00:00
... but is he BALD?		01/01/70 00:00
Would hardly make a difference...		01/01/70 00:00
I may be wrong but i get the impression		01/01/70 00:00
oh yes, I recall		01/01/70 00:00
that is a shortfall.		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List