??? 11/14/06 13:42 Read: times |
#127958 - Now once more you 'cite' and becuse I have not Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In answer to your question, Yes, it is the responsibility of the engineer to select the best component for the task. However, if the board has a given component on it and he's required to use that board, then the best choice is limited to what's on the board, isn't it?
If "is the responsibility of the engineer to select the best component for the task" then how come it is not "the responsibility of the engineer to select the best" board "for the task" In no case at all, however, is it YOUR role to answer a question not asked, nor is it YOUR place to tell him he's wrong just because you don't know how to answer his question. You blatantaly surmise that I do not know and 'cite' that. This is not the first post where you have insulted me with 'citing' that because I do not post a given fact I do not know that fact. I know that a f12x CAN be slowed down, that I will not pay more for speed and then slow it down to match what I could have got for less money evidently totally bypass your sense of 'proper engineering'. When I have no desire slowing down an expensive chip, does that mean that I do not know how to? If I knew how to make a nuclear bomb, and I would not share the knowledge, would that mean that i did not know? If you must 'cite' why do you not 'cite' e.g. http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=127734 where I make it crystal clear that in the days you want us to go back to I used the slowpoke extensively. So as usual you do what Mike states here http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=127828 Erik |