??? 10/12/06 13:20 Read: times |
#126302 - thanks Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks for your comments, Erik.
Erik Malund said:
first you should state what 'expansion' mean. Some less fluent in the English language may read that as "communicating off the board" Ehm. "On board expansion"? Some of them might very well go off board, can't they? Erik Malund said:
"LSI: parallel latch" what is LSI? @#$^!... meant SSI. This part needs rework, I admit. I'd like to add a couple of schematics similar to Gary's... Erik Malund said:
"the controversial 8255" 'controversial'? how about "unusable with modern processors running full speed"?. OK, if you want to be 'diplomatic', fine, but, al least' tell the whole story. I'd like to put a hyperlink there, there are 2 other FAQs on 8255 (it's a discussed chip, isn't it? :-) Erik Malund said:
Use serially interfaced circuits ... a small el cheapo slave processor The slave processor can be interfaced serially or parallel (I have done both) How? Using a latched interface, so the slave can be hung on as external memory? Or using "handcrafted" handshake? Or, forgive me, using a pair of 8255s? ;-) JW |