Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/09/06 21:34
Read: times


 
#127674 - Finally, I've got your attention!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
If you'd address the question before you instead of going on about what you think you know, perhaps this wouldn't be necessary.

OK ... I'm insulting ... I've heard that before ... even from you. OK ... I've been called a bastard before, too. It hasn't hurt me yet.

However, you've got to stop pontificating about what you clearly don't understand.

Any fool can understand that if you run 4KB or more of code (the first 805x's had 4KB, right?) you're doing something, some of the time besides sitting on the external I/O bus. Since you've frequently asserted that the slightly more than 8KB of XRAM on board in your favorite 'F12x's is plenty for you, you won't have external memory, so the bus is available for I/O. I cited the datasheet page that has the parameters for setting the timing on that bus for you yesterday.

Based on that, I asked you to tell us all how much it would slow you down to have an occasional cycle stretched to 230 ns. You apparently couldn't answer. I've shown that, for an infrequent task, such as those valve controls, the effect is very much less significant than the variation in or difference between the best commercial quality crystals. I also showed that for a frequent (60 Hz) 3x update of those 192 controls, it still impacts the system speed by about 0.8%.

Now I ask you, how can you condemn such an arrangement as being "SLOOOOW"? While I'm sure there are tasks for which the 8255 is inappropriate, there are many more for which it's suitable. Is it the "best" way? Well, maybe not, but if it can turn on or off a bit or a byte, or read one, that's all most applications require.

Telling people, just on general principle, or, as you suggest, based on the date code, not to use one, when you don't know why they intend to do that, is just stupid. Now, if you don't object to being considered stupid, then go ahead. You're just telling savvy MCU system designers that your advice is to be taken with a grain of salt.

I think you've made your opinions clear enough to everyone. I doubt anyone will take them as seriously henceforth as they otherwise might.

RE


List of 142 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
New FAQ            01/01/70 00:00      
   all well and good            01/01/70 00:00      
      OK, "blinkey" there now :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Addedto FAQq            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'd call it...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Agreed            01/01/70 00:00      
            missing quotes            01/01/70 00:00      
               it's not a statement            01/01/70 00:00      
            appended            01/01/70 00:00      
   "bible"&co            01/01/70 00:00      
   Jon's RS232 tutorial            01/01/70 00:00      
   code not work            01/01/70 00:00      
   table lookup            01/01/70 00:00      
   ehanced outputs            01/01/70 00:00      
      and extended...            01/01/70 00:00      
         uln            01/01/70 00:00      
            Problem            01/01/70 00:00      
               This happened to me, too            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Bugs            01/01/70 00:00      
            FAQ updated: freewheeling diode            01/01/70 00:00      
   How do Quasi-Bidirectional I/O ports work?            01/01/70 00:00      
      ... and cross-linked...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Space            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE:Space            01/01/70 00:00      
            Would never do that            01/01/70 00:00      
               Might have to !            01/01/70 00:00      
         And criss-cross-linked...            01/01/70 00:00      
   added me own little bit            01/01/70 00:00      
   Does output logic "low" represent 0V?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Nice contribution!            01/01/70 00:00      
         but not new            01/01/70 00:00      
            ???            01/01/70 00:00      
               well, it got the blues            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Cheer up...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     but certainly not the first            01/01/70 00:00      
   device burning            01/01/70 00:00      
      Come on, Jan...            01/01/70 00:00      
         He, who does the work, makes the choices            01/01/70 00:00      
   level/edge interrupt            01/01/70 00:00      
   Added note on use of TABs            01/01/70 00:00      
   updated "code no work" FAQ            01/01/70 00:00      
   What will happen when I use an RC (or C only) rese            01/01/70 00:00      
      What reset ICs are good for '51s?            01/01/70 00:00      
         These things are not necessary ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            You've opened a can of worms now!            01/01/70 00:00      
            you do not use internal flash, do you?            01/01/70 00:00      
               it's broken            01/01/70 00:00      
            can of worms            01/01/70 00:00      
               Something interesting ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  to reset or not to reset            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It's cheaper and easier to use the linear PSU            01/01/70 00:00      
                        then you better get a separate supply            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That's exactly correct!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              why don't they put in GOOD resets?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 The RESET circuit on the Maxim/Dallas parts            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you are TOTALLY missing the point            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 rephrasing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 depends on what your definition of "it" is            01/01/70 00:00      
                           battery            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I think we know enough ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 resets, power sources            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 answered above            01/01/70 00:00      
                        spec for RC            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I've heard that sort of thing before ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         My two cents            01/01/70 00:00      
   How to make a software UART?            01/01/70 00:00      
      comments and suggested additions            01/01/70 00:00      
         many thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
            revised revisions            01/01/70 00:00      
               OK            01/01/70 00:00      
   two "basic" faqs            01/01/70 00:00      
   external memory interfacing            01/01/70 00:00      
   how to expand ports            01/01/70 00:00      
      addition to IO FAQ            01/01/70 00:00      
         pretty good, here are comments            01/01/70 00:00      
            thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
               clarifications            01/01/70 00:00      
            it's there            01/01/70 00:00      
               you're forgetting too much!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  OK sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It\'s just easier to type ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        what about a 'such as'            01/01/70 00:00      
                           the downside is            01/01/70 00:00      
   "what's wrong with 8255" added            01/01/70 00:00      
      assumes facts not in evidence ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         effective?            01/01/70 00:00      
            not even YOU can deny that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               well, so is a steamroller            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Just how much would it slow you down?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     well there goes central USA            01/01/70 00:00      
                     standard answer            01/01/70 00:00      
                        it's just another temper tantrum from Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
                           it is not the age it is the speed            01/01/70 00:00      
                              get real, Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 if I did not need the speed, I would use a cheaper            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    what about the other 191 bits?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Where did I say ONE?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          it's 192, not ONE            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             that is IMPOSSIBLE            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Of course it is, but YOU changed the subject            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   I had posted a lot then I found this            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Finally, I've got your attention!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         How does that you 'cite' something make it that I            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            What do you mean by "speed," Erik?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               Gentlemen please            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  Yes, it's not pretty            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     should we just let such go by?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        When you have no role            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                           correct ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                              but you still have to answer the question            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                 The best choice component should be chosen            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                    Not this time!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                       Now once more you 'cite' and becuse I have not            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                          if the shoe fits ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                             Once again, you circumvent            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                                nope ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                                   A paradox            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                                      have you ever worked for the pointy haired boss            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                                      there's a time for everything            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               here is why            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  and here's how            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     a trip down memory lane            01/01/70 00:00      
         the intended audience of the faqs are newbies...            01/01/70 00:00      
            but newbies aren't children, and you mustn't lie            01/01/70 00:00      
            EGAD! another double-post            01/01/70 00:00      
   New FAQ: debouncing            01/01/70 00:00      
      contributions to debouncing FAQ            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
   http://www.8052.com/faqs.phtml?FAQ=127612            01/01/70 00:00      
   doubt about maskable ROM            01/01/70 00:00      
      not to your advantage, i think            01/01/70 00:00      
   FAQ on ADC            01/01/70 00:00      
   while waiting for a needed device            01/01/70 00:00      
      I would add, that...            01/01/70 00:00      
         will add that in the next minute, thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
      nice!            01/01/70 00:00      
         My two cents and then sum            01/01/70 00:00      
   a good FAQ or other means would be            01/01/70 00:00      
      great idea, start it            01/01/70 00:00      
         you have been unamously by me voted to be            01/01/70 00:00      
            thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
   and one more            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List