Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/27/10 11:57
Read: times


 		 #176226 - read again
Responding to: ???'s previous message
If you only uncomment place 1 and 3 you store the terminator (3 bytes) in the identifier (2 bytes). I think it is correct that it warns about excess initializers here.

it is not

the (3) (1 byte) was added just to allow this.
3 and 1 is preamble (4 bytes for a 4 byte slot) and added 0 (1 byte for a 2 byte slot)

Erik

List of 51 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
SDCC debug            01/01/70 00:00      
   version            01/01/70 00:00      
      2.9.0 #5416            01/01/70 00:00      
         humm            01/01/70 00:00      
            files            01/01/70 00:00      
               General Comments            01/01/70 00:00      
                  stating the problem            01/01/70 00:00      
               why would that be impossible?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  omf smaller than hex            01/01/70 00:00      
                     link, please            01/01/70 00:00      
                        links            01/01/70 00:00      
   played with the commandline options and ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      What do you mean by "blows in startup"?            01/01/70 00:00      
         goes to undefined memory and never reaches main            01/01/70 00:00      
            try one of these options            01/01/70 00:00      
               Thanks, It'll be a day or two            01/01/70 00:00      
                  SiLabs or not            01/01/70 00:00      
                     yes, SILabs            01/01/70 00:00      
                        breakpoint            01/01/70 00:00      
   found a cause, but ....            01/01/70 00:00      
      disassembly            01/01/70 00:00      
      not having _sdcc_external_startup            01/01/70 00:00      
      seems you feed SDCC with a Keil specific header file            01/01/70 00:00      
         false entry, sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
         reply            01/01/70 00:00      
            legal C reused by Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
               3 questions            01/01/70 00:00      
                  3 answers            01/01/70 00:00      
                     thnks for 3 answers and more stuff            01/01/70 00:00      
                        incomplete            01/01/70 00:00      
               since 'porting' to SDCC ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  agreed!            01/01/70 00:00      
   neither works, what do I do            01/01/70 00:00      
      no problem at my place            01/01/70 00:00      
   I ma stuck on the next one            01/01/70 00:00      
      strings in C            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks, Jan ....            01/01/70 00:00      
            that's the kosher way            01/01/70 00:00      
         No, the string shall fit according to the C standard            01/01/70 00:00      
            indeed            01/01/70 00:00      
      bug found            01/01/70 00:00      
         read again            01/01/70 00:00      
         somehow the SDCC forum did not take my post...            01/01/70 00:00      
            sdcc.exe does return an error status            01/01/70 00:00      
               why would you think that?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  grep etc            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Unix goodies            01/01/70 00:00      
            sdcc forum post visible            01/01/70 00:00      
               what are you doing diffrently?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  DOS bat command gotcha            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Thanks Jan            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List