| ??? 05/27/10 04:44 Modified: 05/27/10 07:31 Read: times |
#176217 - indeed Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Indeed. I wasn't aware of this; thanks. So I must take back the "crap" thing about Keil and hereby I apologize for that.
On the other hand, I still maintain that it's nice of the compiler that it warns. Others might be not aware too and be caught by surprise if do this thing inadvertently. There might be a special kind of warning for this very particular case, different from the "normal" "excess initialiser" warning. Warnings in SDCC can be suppressed individually (through a #pragma), so one might chose how far in pedantism want to go, say using a special .h containing only these pragmas; on the other hand, if there is no such warning, one could not be pedantic enough ;-) JW [EDIT] Submitted as feature request https://sourcefor...tid=350599 |
