| ??? 05/25/10 13:59 Modified: 05/25/10 14:58 Read: times |
#176170 - 3 questions Responding to: ???'s previous message |
1) a switch statement give this warning:
Warning 110: conditional flow changed by optimizer: so said EVELYN the modified DOG I checked the assembler and it seems good, am I missing something. If, indeed, there is no error, please inform me how to 'reconstruct' so the warning disappear. I absolutotally dislike to 'accept' warnings. I do see in the manual that there is a means of suppressing warnings I do NOT want to suppress any such. A personal: if someonr wanted me to make it possible, in a product of mine, to suppress warnings, they would have to threaten me with firing to make me do it. 2) I have searched for a SDCC error/warning list with explanations (since both words are used throughout not an easy search) please direct me to where this list is found. 3) I have searched the manual and can, of course, although I hate to, 'experiment' (who knows if the result is general or specific), question: must the ISR prototypes in main include 'interrupt' and/or 'using'? Thanx, Erik |
