??? 03/02/10 09:58 Read: times |
#173728 - why "never"? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Isn't that always the trouble when you want something off-the-shelf?!
There's never anything that quite meets all of your requirements, and the time (ie, cost) that it takes to wade through all the close-but-no-cigar contenders ends up being more than it would've taken to design your own custom thingy. If your requirements get close to "normal", whatever that might be, chances to get what you want increase. You might get something in extra, but that might not be a trouble usually. An example of this is the PC in its many incarnations - although it fits a different class of applications than discussed on this forum. I admit that in embedded the "normal" "class of applications" has a much wider meaning than in the PC-world. Some three years ago I was using for a couple of purposes almost exactly the setup Eric was asking for. A small board, equipped with a uPSD3212 (a dual-UART 12-clocker), one UART went through a MAX232 (including RTS/CTS handshake lines), the other through an isolated RS485, with various on-board options (picked at time of assembly) for powering the isolated side. The uPSDs are natively ISP'd through JTAG, with all the consequences of this. As they are also IAP-able, I have developed an UART-bootloader for comfortable in-field update and a couple of other utilities. There was almost nothing else on the board, except some digital inputs/outputs circuitry and a FRAM for comfortable data logging (that could of course be not populated). I think this would fit perfectly Erik's needs. Whether I could persuade the company I was working for at that time to sell Erik some (plus the trouble of getting them across borders etc.) are all a different issue. But at the same time, we would be more than happy if we could buy those boards off-the-shelf, rather than waste time and energy for building them. One of the boxes I am working on today is... an RS485/RS232 protocol converter enclosed in a DIN-rail box in a rather industrial style. That again might be meeting Eric's needs, except that it is not '51 based... ;-) JW |