??? 03/01/10 13:49 Read: times |
#173684 - That's what I thought Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
to 'up' a '51 to a '52 does not require a second UART and, of course, the terms are used pretty generically these days... |
??? 03/01/10 13:49 Read: times |
#173684 - That's what I thought Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
to 'up' a '51 to a '52 does not require a second UART and, of course, the terms are used pretty generically these days... |