??? 02/28/10 08:34 Read: times |
#173641 - Likewise Responding to: ???'s previous message |
See: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/172768
Richard Erlacher said:
It's not a '51, of course, since two UARTS would be a '52 ... And three would be a '53 ?! |
??? 02/28/10 08:34 Read: times |
#173641 - Likewise Responding to: ???'s previous message |
See: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/172768
Richard Erlacher said:
It's not a '51, of course, since two UARTS would be a '52 ... And three would be a '53 ?! |