Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Thread Closed: Thread will re-open when original poster replies

???
07/26/05 20:59
Read: times


 
#98217 - In-system programming
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Charles Bannister said:
Hello Russell,

You are right. Using later IC's could have saved a lot of work. I didn't mind the effort it took to build the programmer. I feel it pays off in the long run. Below is a picture of the programmer.

Regards,

Charles Bannister

http://members.aol.com/cpu8052/D...mVideo.gif


In general, the idea behind in-system programming in microcontrollers is to build the necessary programming support hardware into the final target device, not to encourage the construction of homebuilt device programmers. The hardware required for ISP, especially with this device, is intended to be truly minimal, so that its addition does not add significantly to the cost or size of the product it is used in. For most applications with serial communication support, adding in-system programming support can be achieved for literally the cost of a '125 tri-state buffer (well under a dollar). Sure, that's a few pennies not in your pocket for every product sold. But if you forego the ISP support in the target, every time you have to deploy a technician to a customer site for a firmware upgrade instead of having the user download firmware from your web site, a lot of dollars will be leaving your pocket.

--Sasha Jevtic

List of 38 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Looking for 80C251 board            01/01/70 00:00      
   DS89C450 is fast 8051.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Cheap 'n' cheerful            01/01/70 00:00      
      builtin bootloader            01/01/70 00:00      
         Common place            01/01/70 00:00      
            good to know            01/01/70 00:00      
               And Texas Instruments            01/01/70 00:00      
                  DS89C4x0            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Not sure            01/01/70 00:00      
                        DS89C420 vs. DS89C430/440/450            01/01/70 00:00      
                     You are probably right            01/01/70 00:00      
                  ok            01/01/70 00:00      
            Death of the Programmer            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes, it's nice            01/01/70 00:00      
            comments            01/01/70 00:00      
      "marketing"            01/01/70 00:00      
         let's put it this way:            01/01/70 00:00      
            Which is exactly what they say ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               overview            01/01/70 00:00      
                  DS'420 IAP            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I'm not polite...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        MAXIM/Dallas and Flash            01/01/70 00:00      
                           common practice today            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Nor forgetting            01/01/70 00:00      
                              DS2250 - Secure Micro            01/01/70 00:00      
      Very nice and informative            01/01/70 00:00      
   Saved a few cents for a lot of work.            01/01/70 00:00      
      In-system programming            01/01/70 00:00      
         ISP Header            01/01/70 00:00      
      schematics?            01/01/70 00:00      
         if you are looking for schematics of ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why on earth            01/01/70 00:00      
   '251 board            01/01/70 00:00      
   if you decide to leave the '51 (which yo            01/01/70 00:00      
   8052.com SBC supports DS89C420            01/01/70 00:00      
   Dead Thread?            01/01/70 00:00      
NOTICE: Message(s) moved            01/01/70 00:00      
   Moving posts            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List