??? 11/30/10 07:16 Read: times |
#179732 - Utterly bovine Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
This seems udderly bovine, if you can not install as a 'user', say so and why does a 'user' installing need U: when an administrator does not? The fault here is almost certainly in the application - not the OS. There are a lot of lazy programmers writing trashy PC code who had just been "getting away with it" when Windoze had no security and/or users, by default, did everything as Administrator. I have a disappointingly large number of programs that just won't work on XP except with Administrator priviledge - so it's hardly surprising that things get worse with Vista and later! :-( And, when this trash doesn't work, any messages usually are obscure - very rarely do they explicitly say, "you need to be an Administrator to run this" Worse, the packaging never mentions this, so you can't find out until you've installed it - and you usually can't get a refund after you've installed it! :-( |