Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 08/22/10 13:31 Read: times	#178216 - did you mean "without" calling it DB9? Responding to: ???'s previous message

List of 35 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
Part programmer reputation		01/01/70 00:00
Goals?		01/01/70 00:00
Why ? ? ? ? ? ? ?		01/01/70 00:00
"Smilies" not working		01/01/70 00:00
Smilies		01/01/70 00:00
Deep linking		01/01/70 00:00
I remember...		01/01/70 00:00
Alternative		01/01/70 00:00
Such as...?		01/01/70 00:00
Other Stuff		01/01/70 00:00
The things I don't have...		01/01/70 00:00
Some Items		01/01/70 00:00
often see these referred to as "DB25" or "DB9" (sic)		01/01/70 00:00
Hard to use correct terminology if people don't understand		01/01/70 00:00
It's like the difference between assembler and compiler		01/01/70 00:00
You can avoid the incorrect		01/01/70 00:00
did you mean "without" calling it DB9?		01/01/70 00:00
Yes, I did!		01/01/70 00:00
Since you've done it already ... He won't		01/01/70 00:00
Why would you do that???		01/01/70 00:00
Who said that??		01/01/70 00:00
It's battery chargers that may have D+/D- shorted		01/01/70 00:00
original USB host connector isn't designed...		01/01/70 00:00
Most probably		01/01/70 00:00
USB port current sourcing		01/01/70 00:00
laptop has a more-comprehensive port power management		01/01/70 00:00
the 'reputation' of 'burners' is ....		01/01/70 00:00
UV light is dangerous to the eyes		01/01/70 00:00
EEPROMs		01/01/70 00:00
General response		01/01/70 00:00
If		01/01/70 00:00
Oops		01/01/70 00:00
I do not know what you really want		01/01/70 00:00
Understood		01/01/70 00:00
Cygnal Evaluation board		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List