??? 06/05/10 15:47 Read: times |
#176427 - is that the reason I need a multi-GHz PC to ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
So in order for gimme code to be useful to a large selection of people, it must be reasonably generalized, which means it must be made more cumbersome than any one individual would ever need.
is that the reason I need a multi-GHz PC to even get a compile done the same day That means that whoever uses it is going to have to tailor it to their specific need. That would be a total abolishment of the idea of "reusable code" thus the types that write code for the PC would ABHOR to "tailor it to their specific need", since, for them, the principle is more important than efficiency. as an illustration, let us assume that neither 'C' nor assembler had a divide. then a 'reusable' divide, which must be capable of dividing 100 gadzillion by 100 gadzillion, would be implemented to do 4/2 Erik anybody ever thought of the lack of 'greenness' of todays PC code. If the PC code had been written with efficiency in mind a 'sufficient' PC could be built using half as much power. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Gimme Code: Is it really worth it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, in intensive writing situations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unreasonable expectations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As an exercise... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
gimme binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Did he? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sometimes you'll find out what you need on the go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fundamental flaw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then "gimme binary and schematics" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LCD code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not the point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ah, I see... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
now we know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ha! My wife and children... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
two key words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wouldn't go that far | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code Reuse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A possible counterpoint, or maybe a confirmation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is that the reason I need a multi-GHz PC to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
an example of really useful 'reusable' code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler libraries | 01/01/70 00:00 |