??? 06/04/10 08:15 Read: times |
#176377 - Fundamental flaw Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
He might've whip up the hardware, burn the givn'im code... There's the fundamental flaw in this - and most other - "gimme code" demands: without knowing exactly what the hardware is, it is impossible to give ready-to-run code! |
Topic | Author | Date |
Gimme Code: Is it really worth it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, in intensive writing situations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unreasonable expectations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As an exercise... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
gimme binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Did he? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sometimes you'll find out what you need on the go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fundamental flaw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then "gimme binary and schematics" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LCD code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not the point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ah, I see... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
now we know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ha! My wife and children... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
two key words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wouldn't go that far | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code Reuse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A possible counterpoint, or maybe a confirmation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is that the reason I need a multi-GHz PC to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
an example of really useful 'reusable' code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler libraries | 01/01/70 00:00 |