| ??? 06/04/10 17:18 Read: times |
#176390 - Ah, I see... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Robert Revens said:
I found Andy Peters' LCD code useful in some recent stuff I was doing (http://www.latke.net/lcd/), and the Code Architect stuff is useful too (http://www.codearchitect.org/nxp/v2/) for LPC's and adaptable for other micros. But the point is, were you able to just drop it in and run? Or did you have to spend some time understanding it, and then figuring out how to adapt it to your specific requirements, and/or interface it to the rest of your system? That seems to be the fundamental flaw in most "gimme code" requests. No, and yes. However, it's not in my nature to use anything that I don't understand. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Gimme Code: Is it really worth it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, in intensive writing situations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unreasonable expectations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As an exercise... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gimme binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did he? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes you'll find out what you need on the go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fundamental flaw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then "gimme binary and schematics" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LCD code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not the point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah, I see... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| now we know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ha! My wife and children... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| two key words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I wouldn't go that far | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Reuse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A possible counterpoint, or maybe a confirmation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is that the reason I need a multi-GHz PC to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an example of really useful 'reusable' code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler libraries | 01/01/70 00:00 |