??? 02/06/10 13:40 Read: times |
#172944 - Different Issue! yes it is Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Ap Charles said:
The below links belongs to Public organizations stating what their take for DCCT is:
Batavia, IL USA GOVT http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/definitions/dcct.html Yes - but that needs to be specificall called a DCCT - it is not just a plain "CT". It is a device that has a sepatate excitation coil, and measures DC indirectly by its effect on the saturation of the core. And this, in turn, is entirely different from a Hall-effect based sensor. Again, if you just say "CT", then that has to mean that a basic Current Transformer will do the job. If either a DCCT or a Hall-effect device is required - as in this case - then you must specifically say so. Just saying "CT" is likely to be misleading. Erik Malund said; Erik Malund said:
Ap Charles said: you just invented the DC transformer, patent it immediately. You will be one of the worlds richest people. Erik It should have been mentioned DC CT instead ! So your explanation might be helpful for him as he doesnt seems to know/account about the abbrevation DCCT and its existance as he offers me to get this patented . Its upto OP to use what technology as per his/her requirements , you are reasonable to me as atleast you consider the existance of DCCT . Ap said:
True Transformer and False Transformer is not the part of discussion but Abbreviations. Andy Neil said:
Wrong. The term "transformer" specifically means an inductively-coupled device - so calling a Hall-effect device a "transfomer" is plain wrong. It's not just an abbreviation, it's wrong. FALSE !! if it has to mean inductively coupled device it has to be called ' ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER' and not as you simply call it a 'TRANSFORMER' . Transformer has various meanings google could show you. Andy Neil -Ap |