Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/13/09 23:42
Read: times


 
#162382 - Just one machine?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Is it just one machine you have these latency problems with, or is it more than one?

By the way: If you need a permanent machine for collecting the data, I think this may be an interesting solution:
http://www.tranquilpc-shop.co.uk/acatalog/...GCLF2.html

It is cheap and reasonably low-power (they "forget" to tell that the 4W processor is mated with a 22W chipset...) so you could use it as a dedicated machine for this task. And with Linux (or maybe some older OS you have laying around) you don't need to spend money on any OS. Having a dual-core, hyperthreaded, processor means it can run four applications at a time which would be advantageous for minimizing latencies.

There are also complete machines available if you don't want to spend the time figuring out the best case to use.

If your sensor system can send using USB or Ethernet, then I don't think you would need any separate buffering if you are a bit careful with your installation. And the PCI slot would allow a synchronous serial board if the sensor system can't support USB or Ethernet. I would expect a synchronous communication board capable of 10Mbit transfers to have enough buffer capacity to make sure it can run continuously without dropping data - after all, the expected target OS for such a communications board would be Windows or Linux.

List of 32 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
How would you guys do it?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not sure Windows can do it            01/01/70 00:00      
      High-speed USB and a buffer            01/01/70 00:00      
         USB for DOS?            01/01/70 00:00      
            once you remove all the potential source...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Latency is the problem - not the transfer rate            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You're right ... it's the latency            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Just one machine?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Nope ... it seems that all Windows boxes are slow            01/01/70 00:00      
                           The hw shouldn't be hobbled            01/01/70 00:00      
               I'd love to use USB, but lack faith in the OS            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Try other PC or deactivate devices if you get lockups            01/01/70 00:00      
                     this all puzzles me            01/01/70 00:00      
                        1.5GB/minute reasonable for backup to USB2 disk            01/01/70 00:00      
   lantronix xport ??            01/01/70 00:00      
      How would that help?            01/01/70 00:00      
   with PCI or ISA with dma            01/01/70 00:00      
      gigabit ethernet?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Gbit normally overkill            01/01/70 00:00      
         I've considered that ... I don't like the overhead            01/01/70 00:00      
            economical ways            01/01/70 00:00      
               Do those work with DOS?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  any of OS will do...            01/01/70 00:00      
            100Mbit Ethernet on 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
   Firewire will do it            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's probably too much overhead!            01/01/70 00:00      
   LVDS to PCI card            01/01/70 00:00      
   re: how            01/01/70 00:00      
      It's not that simple            01/01/70 00:00      
         ESCC is the best option            01/01/70 00:00      
         do you REALLY think            01/01/70 00:00      
            Shouldn't be a problem            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List