Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Thread Closed: Became flame-war

???
02/13/08 06:11
Modified:
  02/13/08 06:18
Read: times


 		 #150695 - you have no id... Prove your rants then
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:


we have ZERO failures after the one or two bad joints on one or two of the boards in a lot have been fixed. I think that over ~5000 boards I have seen ONE defective semiconductor. Now, at one time it was much worse, but after installing antistatic measures we achieved the above.


You must not be having ISO 9000 quality management systems if the defect arises due to antistatic measures . I didnot talked about bad joint , if I do talk about em you can have plenty of defective boards. I said after testing which includes plenty of tests.

Erik Malund said:

You have no idea, do you? the wear leveling algorithm is applied to flash where there is a finite number of erases possible, that is not 'wear' that is flash technology.


I talked about memory didnt I . Again as you use the memory in the name of technology again and again it does wear . why you claim such things Malund .I had a notion that you are a seasoned person , but should I keep that notion afterreading this ?

Erik Malund said:

explanattion for your rants about 'wear'
Erik

And you didnt rant that the device will not fail if worked in the specified limits didnt you? .

Prove it how many times can you drive load via port pin high to low (you can use the said parameter in the datasheet), take for example AT89C51 and give us the data regarding the failure rates ,for or your claim . I have stated earlier and please listen to it again when you operate within the specified limits the device does have failure rates caused by succesive use which may lead to final breakdown , which you dont agree .

AP

PS : When I ask for proving things ... I dont get replies ha hah ha . I dont care



List of 56 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
port P0 and resistor pull-up            01/01/70 00:00      
   It needs a pullup, but it's pretty arbitrary            01/01/70 00:00      
   NO its not a good idea ,use only 10K or big and            01/01/70 00:00      
      it depends            01/01/70 00:00      
      wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
         wrong how?,if you want to make MCU taxing systems            01/01/70 00:00      
            He may not need buffers            01/01/70 00:00      
               Read the title of the original post            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not generally true            01/01/70 00:00      
               Please tell him that            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Please read your own post            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Thanks for your suggestion but .            01/01/70 00:00      
                        No problem with that            01/01/70 00:00      
                           You mean no other safe way?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Wrong again            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Please prove it , I dont believe in hard driving            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Your way is not the only way            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 And here I recall design experience?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    HUH            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       What HUH ???? , Does your MCU runs Endless?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          black/white and grey            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Keep Fantasizing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                what on earth does that answer have to do with my            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   As you favour such things            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      now, as before, you are totally off the rocker.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         What made you so excited with this?? may I know .            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Did you read this in full Malund before commenti            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    That thread is still open            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       I dont feel the need            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          ideology vs stupidity            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             ideology vs stupidity VS MTBF , you seem not to            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Oh yes it does            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   I just cant believe Andy replies for Malund?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Nobody imposed it            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Please prove it .            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      It's a public forum            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         not battlefield ;-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            battlefield - No way , Neil likes healthy debate            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Ofcourse it is a Public forum You avoided my post            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                you have no idea do you?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Now you're getting yourself confused, Erik!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      OK            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Is that anything to do with soft wear?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         who asks for that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   you have no id... Prove your rants then            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      you do the math            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Which method is applied to test the wear            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Overstressing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Overstressing --- I dont advocate this            01/01/70 00:00      
                              The O/P didn't say ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               very late response            01/01/70 00:00      
      if            01/01/70 00:00      
         see ... here's an example of what I meant!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Yes, but he doesn\'t say whether or for what            01/01/70 00:00      
      Internal pullups            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why all that hassle?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List