Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/24/07 20:16
Read: times


 
#143602 - Generally Speaking
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I find that the typical arm parts allow for more flexible power handling. For example, you have control over the core frequency and have separate control over each peripheral clock. So you can really fine tune as needed.

Most parts are quite capable of 8051 type <1uA sleep current. However, it takes more work (time) to minimize overall power consumption. You have more peripherals, more I/O (generally), and more bus structures to tweak....ergo the additional time spent.

List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
[OT] Has the ARM shakeout begun...?            01/01/70 00:00      
   ARM patents ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Is that a shakeout?            01/01/70 00:00      
      but is it the start of one?            01/01/70 00:00      
         It\'ll be the start when the low-end ARM costs less            01/01/70 00:00      
            Isn't that already the case?            01/01/70 00:00      
               It is            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Re: it is            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Maybe not            01/01/70 00:00      
                  the cost of the chip alone (in quantity of ONE)...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  How reliable is the LPC2368?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Similar to LPC            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Mostly ARM design            01/01/70 00:00      
                        This is good news...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Power?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Generally Speaking            01/01/70 00:00      
               core consumption LPC2104 - datasheet            01/01/70 00:00      
            link?            01/01/70 00:00      
               LINUX            01/01/70 00:00      
                  low-end?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It depends on what you consider            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Sounds like ARM9            01/01/70 00:00      
                           At the time, both were involved            01/01/70 00:00      
                              at Keil/Raisonance it seems NXP has won            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 RELAX, Erik! ~ is close enough ... it matters not            01/01/70 00:00      
   NXP goes into Linux/Windows?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List