Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/05/06 15:14
Read: times


 
#119681 - I don't think so ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:

It is about 87 times easier to program something intermitent into a FPGA than it is to do so in a uC.


I'm not at all sure what you've said here, but, somehow, I doubt you know, either.

Erik Malund said:
I can teach someone to program a FPGA in, maybe, a day, to teach someone to program one so that no 'rarely occuring strange things' happen will take, at least, months.


Gee ... it takes me a day just to switch from one vendor's tools to another, and I've done it dozens of times. Unless you're programming a device to be a flipflop or a simple gate, I think there's room for doubt.

Remember, too, that you're the guy who doesn't need a cycle-by-cycle simulation of what you do. While that may be the case for you, as you know absolutely everything there is to know about the devices you routinely use, in a programmable logic device of any sort, you have to cover all the possible cases, not just the ones you think you might encounter.

The reason I have as many computers as I do is because simulations might take a week or two at a pass, particularly since the "free" tools are "hobbleware," being intentionally "limited" (slowed down once the design takes on reasonable proportions). I think one day might be long enough to get through the programming task, i.e. how to inject the bitstream into the device, but not for a complete lesson in design, development, and verification.

RE





List of 15 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
FPGA's            01/01/70 00:00      
   re: FPGAs            01/01/70 00:00      
      Re:FPGA            01/01/70 00:00      
         FPGAs            01/01/70 00:00      
            re: FPGAs            01/01/70 00:00      
               re: FPGA            01/01/70 00:00      
                  re: FPGAs            01/01/70 00:00      
                     reply            01/01/70 00:00      
         re: FPGAs            01/01/70 00:00      
   Maybe you should do the basic work            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hello Richard,            01/01/70 00:00      
   study Mr. Boole, then            01/01/70 00:00      
      I don't think so ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Taken out of context, i would make no su            01/01/70 00:00      
   A good thing would be            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List