Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/27/06 20:02
Modified:
  05/27/06 21:05

Read: times


 
#117172 - stupid me
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Me certainly stupid, no doubt... This is the second time in this week I don't understand the joke everything laughs at.

Can somebody please explain me, what is the point? Thanks.

Jan Waclawek

[Added later:]
Oh yes, now I see.
My question relates to the following: do you consider C to be HLL or just a tool to program? In the former case, there is no point ridicule statements as those - HLLs are intended to enable programming in a way as close to normal human thinking as possible, in an almost normal language. So if the programmer thinks about the problem as e.g. "if Ralf is not at the endpoint (=47) make it to be so", he simply writes it down in the syntax required by the language. The programmer is not only not required to optimize, he should not to do so - it's the task of the compiler and stuff.

On the other hand, if one uses it as a simple tool, it is the same as in assembler - it is normally unreadable anyway, so one almost unconsciously optimizes himself.

C is exactly the language I'd never consider a HLL but it is often used as such... but not in microcontrollers, apparently...

Jan Waclawek




List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
stupid code            01/01/70 00:00      
   Optimiser?            01/01/70 00:00      
      I use the NASA approach            01/01/70 00:00      
         Optimisation            01/01/70 00:00      
   it's an oscillator!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not stupid at all            01/01/70 00:00      
      context            01/01/70 00:00      
   how about just plain ugle code?            01/01/70 00:00      
      stupid, but for other reasons            01/01/70 00:00      
      Normal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         watch your language            01/01/70 00:00      
            I think the word is "inane."            01/01/70 00:00      
               nope            01/01/70 00:00      
            Too Late            01/01/70 00:00      
   Always false            01/01/70 00:00      
      Just a typo ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   That reminds me            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's why I keep saying ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      You never know            01/01/70 00:00      
         I object vehemently            01/01/70 00:00      
         it's because he's stupid, not clever            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hmmmmmm...            01/01/70 00:00      
            who maintains?            01/01/70 00:00      
   stupid me            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not stupid you,stupid programmers            01/01/70 00:00      
      not HLL            01/01/70 00:00      
         abstraction            01/01/70 00:00      
            abstraction is the ideal            01/01/70 00:00      
               if you do not care about cost/performanc            01/01/70 00:00      
                  getting back to your original statement.            01/01/70 00:00      
   sheesh            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List